The rise and fall of the Black Panther Party, the most revolutionary of Civil Rights groups

A round pin features a black panther illustration on a green background with red text partially visible around the edges.
Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, Art and Artifacts Division, The New York Public Library. (1900 - 2000). Free The Panther 21 Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/d6074f20-6be8-0135-a7c4-3596a06ec7cd

In 1966, a new political organisation emerged from the streets of Oakland, California, that offered a new approach to the African American struggle for justice.

 

Armed with ideas for change, its founders rejected non-violence and called for self-defence and system-wide change.

 

The movement quickly captured national attention because of its militant actions, but also drew notice for its wide-ranging community programs and political ideas. 

How the Black Panther Party was created

The Black Panther Party for Self-Defense began in October 1966, when Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale, both students at Merritt College in Oakland, decided to challenge the unchecked violence African Americans suffered at the hands of police.

 

They had studied revolutionary writings from figures like Frantz Fanon, Mao Zedong, and Malcolm X, and they believed that oppressed communities could only achieve real justice by seizing control of their own protection and representation.

 

Newton had closely read Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth, while Seale admired the speeches of Malcolm X and had worked with the Afro-American Association and voter registration drives in Oakland. 

Newton and Seale carried firearms and law books when they formed armed patrols that followed police officers through Black neighbourhoods, which ensured that arrests remained visible and lawful.

 

They asserted that their actions were permitted under California’s then-legal open carry laws and claimed the right to monitor public officials.

 

These patrols, later known as "copwatching," drew sharp reactions from law enforcement and lawmakers, which led directly to a statewide debate about open-carry gun laws. 

When around two dozen Black Panthers entered the California State Capitol on May 2, 1967, to protest the Mulford Act, a proposed bill to ban the public carrying of loaded firearms, they shocked politicians and stunned the media.

 

Although the group broke no laws, the display of armed African Americans inside a legislative chamber forced white Americans to confront a new form of racial politics.

 

Governor Ronald Reagan supported the bill, which passed in July 1967 and directly responded to the Panthers' actions.

 

From that moment, the Party inspired chapters to form in major cities across the country. 


Who were the most important people in the Party?

Huey Newton was the Party’s theoretical backbone and symbol of resistance, especially after his 1967 arrest for the shooting of officer John Frey.

 

He remained central to the Party’s development, even as his legal troubles and later personal challenges disrupted his leadership.

 

His concept of “revolutionary intercommunalism” later guided the Party’s shift toward community service and away from armed confrontation. 

 

Bobby Seale was the administrative organiser and national spokesperson. His speeches energised new recruits, and his 1973 mayoral campaign in Oakland gathered a significant following. 

Eldridge Cleaver, who had spent time in prison before joining the Panthers, became the Party’s Minister of Information.

 

He gained fame through his book Soul on Ice, which detailed his radical philosophy and controversial views on race, gender, and violence.

 

Cleaver pushed the Party to embrace more aggressive tactics and forged alliances with international revolutionary movements.

 

However, his growing conflict with Newton eventually fractured the leadership. 

Fred Hampton, who led the Illinois chapter in Chicago, expanded the Party’s reach through the Rainbow Coalition, a multiracial alliance that included the Young Lords, Young Patriots, and other working-class organisations.

 

He had begun to unite poor communities regardless of race or ethnicity until police killed him in a December 4, 1969, raid.

 

Hampton, who was only 21 years old, had been drugged by an FBI informant and was shot in his bed during a pre-dawn raid, which involved approximately fourteen Chicago police officers.

 

His death was later revealed to have been part of a coordinated operation by the FBI and local authorities and became a turning point in the national struggle between the Panthers and the state. 


What did the Black Panther Party want?

The Black Panther Party demanded full civil and economic rights for African Americans, outlining their vision in a 10-Point Program published in 1966.

 

They called for immediate freedom, employment, decent housing, education that exposed the truth about Black history, and an end to police violence.

 

They demanded exemption from military service for African Americans and the release of all Black men imprisoned by the justice system, which they viewed as illegitimate and racist. 

Beyond these specific goals, the Party envisioned a revolutionary transformation of American society.

 

They saw capitalism as a system that exploited the working class, and they viewed imperialism as another mechanism of oppression.

 

Also, hey argued that systemic racism crushed resistance. Through radical publications and speeches, they encouraged African Americans to reject assimilation and instead build power through solidarity, political education, and self-determination. 

The Panthers described themselves as internationalists and revolutionaries, as they connected their struggle to liberation movements in Vietnam, Algeria, and Cuba.

 

Their use of Marxist language and Third World imagery challenged Cold War narratives and cast the United States as a global oppressor. 


The most important events in the Party's history

By 1968, the Black Panther Party had grown into a national group with more than thirty chapters in major American cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia.

 

At its peak, the group boasted roughly 2,000 to 5,000 active members, many of whom took part in daily activities such as political education classes, community programs, and security patrols. 

 

That same year, the Party launched its Free Breakfast for Children Program, which served thousands of meals in churches, schools, and community centres.

 

By the end of 1969, more than 45 breakfast programs ran across the United States.

 

This effort, along with health clinics, sickle cell anaemia testing, clothing drives, and legal aid services, won considerable support in Black neighbourhoods.

 

Although rarely reported in mainstream media, these initiatives brought real improvements to local communities. 

During 1969, tensions between the Panthers and police rose sharply. Dozens of shootouts occurred, and multiple members were arrested or killed.

 

The December 1969 raid that killed Fred Hampton and Mark Clark in Chicago exposed the serious consequences of growing government hostility.

 

As alluded to above, documents obtained years later confirmed that the FBI had identified Hampton as a significant threat and coordinated with local police to eliminate him. 

Between 1970 and 1972, the Party underwent internal restructuring. Several leaders faced prison time, exile, or assassination.

 

As a result, Newton restructured the group to focus more heavily on local community programs and electoral politics, particularly in Oakland.

 

One major initiative included the founding of the Oakland Community School in 1973, which provided free, high-quality education under Panther leadership.

 

However, this shift alienated members in other chapters, and conflicts over leadership strategy weakened national unity. 


Growing concerns about the Party

As public awareness of the Panthers grew, so did concerns from both state officials and mainstream civil rights leaders.

 

Their direct tactics, combat-style clothing, and armed demonstrations frightened many who had supported earlier, non-violent campaigns led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr

Local police departments frequently clashed with Panthers, which led to raids, arrests, and accusations of excessive force.

 

Many of these incidents turned deadly, and public opinion began to shift, especially as news reports focused on violence rather than the group’s social activism. 

Within the Party, different chapters pursued different goals. Some focused almost entirely on community welfare, while others prepared for open confrontation with police.

 

Leadership disputes, accusations of corruption, and instances of internal violence began to tear the organisation apart.

 

Cleaver’s eventual split from Newton resulted in armed conflict between factions and discredited the movement’s claim to disciplined, unified resistance.

 

During this period, Elaine Brown assumed leadership from 1974 to 1977. She was the only woman to lead the national organisation. 


FBI's COINTELPRO and the decline of the Party

The FBI targeted the Black Panther Party through COINTELPRO, a secret program that aimed to undermine political organisations seen as subversive.

 

Under the direction of J. Edgar Hoover, agents infiltrated local chapters, circulated fake letters, and spread false information to incite division and distrust.

 

In 1969, Hoover publicly declared that the Panthers represented the greatest threat to the internal security of the country. 

 

Informants supplied law enforcement with intelligence used to arrest Panther members, often on exaggerated or fabricated charges.

 

Leaders such as Geronimo Pratt, a Vietnam War veteran honoured for bravery, spent 27 years in prison before a court overturned his conviction in 1997 after revelations that the FBI had suppressed key proof of innocence.

 

In some cases, false information led directly to deadly confrontations between Panthers and police. 

Internal surveillance and sabotage created a culture of suspicion that paralysed the group’s operations.

 

Chapters began to collapse as morale fell and funding dried up. Newton, who had returned from exile in Cuba, struggled with drug addiction and faced multiple criminal charges.

 

By the early 1980s, only the Oakland chapter remained active, and it soon closed down. 

The official end of the group in 1982 marked the end of its official presence.

 

However, COINTELPRO’s long-term impact had already severely hurt the group. It succeeded in weakening the Panthers by applying pressure together with targeted violence and by isolating them politically.

 

The existence of COINTELPRO came to public attention after a 1971 break-in at an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, which exposed hundreds of secret documents. 


What impact did the Black Panther Party have?

The Black Panther Party altered the course of American activism by calling out racial inequality and exposing how economic and political systems oppressed Black communities.

 

It forced national attention on issues that had long been ignored and exposed the brutality of state repression in ways that changed how Americans understood their own democracy. 

 

When the Panthers created grassroots programs in poor neighbourhoods, they showed that local people could meet their own needs without relying on government assistance.

 

Their clinics, schools, and meal services became models for later efforts by churches, charities, and public institutions. 

Culturally, the Party helped popularise the idea of Black pride, self-respect, and resistance.

 

It gave young African Americans a sense of identity and purpose during a time of widespread loss of faith.

 

The movement’s imagery, slogans, and writings continue to influence music, art, and political organising in the twenty-first century.

 

Contemporary movements such as Black Lives Matter have echoed Panther principles, particularly in their use of community aid networks and critique of systemic injustice. 

Although the Party fractured under internal and external pressure, its vision remains a source of debate and inspiration.

 

Historians continue to study its rise and decline as a case study in extreme activism and state suppression, and examine its role in advancing the pursuit of social justice in modern America.